Hanging out in Arizona has given me an interesting perspective on the new State Law requiring Law Enforcement to alert Federal Agencies of suspected Illegal Immigrants. If anybody has been taking a look at the news, its getting a lot of coverage (Sadly to say more so than the massive oil spill in the Gulf or about BP's legal attempts to wiggle out of financial responsibility for the cleanup), but that might be because its more relative to the people live here.
The part of the law that is so controversial is the fact that by requiring officers to considering the citizenship of those under suspect implies that they are required to use stereotypes and race as the basis for that suspicion. I'm not sure if that's the extent of the law, but in reality, if the vast insurmountable majority of illegal immigrants are indeed from the other side of the border here, than yes, they will be Mexican (which doesn't imply one race to people who live in Mexico for that matter). Is that racist or just an application of common sense and reasonability? I have no problem with the law. I am in fact surprised at my interview of an officer of how inconsiderate police officers are of the majority of federal law. If you want immigration reform, argue for that, not for ignoring illegal immigrants.
Haha, and then this morning the news played for me a campaign commercial of a candidate for Governor of Alabama, Tim James, who is promising that if he is elected the Alabama Driving License Exam will be given only in English. This too, I have no problem with. English is the language of the law, a legal examination must be in English as far as I see. If a Police Officer stops you, what are you going to do if you don't speak English? People are calling this racist, and Tim James is responding its not about race, its about Language.
I think people are whining about the race card here. Perhaps people feel the culture they live in is being threatened too (on both sides of the argument). But that is not the same about whining about racism.
Alright, so here's the bill: http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf
So the stuff about cars: you can't get pulled over if you're suspected of being undocumented. You just have to show your documents if you get pulled over for some infraction, and that's reasonable. People pretty much do that already.
I, however, was thinking too narrowly. There are at least a few disturbing things I saw in the bill, and I really just skimmed through it. For one, it seems that an illegal migrant being on any public or private property will be trespassing along with solicitation of work (meaning, then, the police can ask for your documents if you're standing in some parking lot, walking on the street, or being pretty much anywhere, because if you're in the country illegally you'll have committed a state crime). For another, it will be illegal to transport or hide or invite to the country anyone you know came or would come here illegally.
I do think the bill will probably be ruled unconstitutional, given that it's the federal government's role to deal with immigration. (See http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#immigration .) But regardless of constitutionality, the whole thing just screams "police state." Do you really support that, Fiver?
I agree with the statement that "illegal means illegal." The only real issue here that bothers me is the division of powers between the state and federal governments. I'd like to see some precedents based on the unconstitutionality of laws based off of either the 9th or 10th amendment(s).
But after reading the bill I see what people have been talking about: Next time you're in Arizona, a policeman can walk up to you anywhere and ask for your papers as long as he has "reasonable suspicion" that you're illegal. It's not that it matters too much to say that illegals commit crimes now by doing pretty much anything; it's that saying so allows the police to butt into absolutely anyone and everyone's lives.
The inverted racist creates more paranoia than the actual racist will create logic. Paranoia is a more wholesome prejudice than racism. Racism wastes time though.
I sure don't. Being too uppity about racism - "anti-racism" - may lead to awkwardness and overly careful speech, but actual racism can lead to things that are FAR worse.
Honestly Ak the way I see it is Racism is like pendulum, actually more like a swing. It's going to make it's biggest swing then come down and go the other way but reach a lower height then it did before and it will keep doing this patern of lower and lower until eventually it's equal. At this point the our side of the swing is finally over, it's now everyone else turn. Hopefully when I say the amount will be a lot lower then us instead of slightly lower. I bring this up as I believe this anti-racism to be the first step in the other direction.
The problem was that you could be stopped by the police if they suspected you were undocumented. (I say was because I believe the governor amended the bill now so that they cannot, and they can only check immigration papers if you are stopped for some other offense.) It's the difference between a primary and secondary offense: In some states, for example, you cannot get pulled over for not wearing a seat-belt; you only get fined for not wearing a seat belt if you're pulled over for another reason.
The Arizona law basically indicated that you could get pulled over for looking undocumented. I call that racism. (But again, I believe that part of the law has already been amended.)
I haven't read the law, so I don't know what more to say. It won't go into effect for a few months though, I believe, if it goes into effect at all. We'll see what happens.
It doesn't go into effect until after the legislative session is over, unless something in Arizona state law halts challenged laws and I'm not aware of.